So I guess it’s official. Traitors are AOK with Bush, as long as they’re his own personal cuddly election stealing traitor. Will Bush fire Rove now? Will he speak?
I still don’t believe Rove is off the hook like his lawyer Luskin has stated.
Fitz has not confirmed Luskin’s statement.
Can anyone come up with something to refute this statement? I can’t find a thing.
Note this part of the article:
“Novak said he is talking now because Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald told the columnist’s lawyer that after 2 1/2 years his investigation of the CIA leak case concerning matters directly relating to Novak has been concluded.”
“concluded” does not mean exonerated. Isn’t that what Luskin also said about his clients case, the investigation is concluded. If Rove were off the hook wouldn’t you think that Fitz would put something in writing, a letter, an e-mail? Wouldn’t he tell someone else like maybe the press, in order to give the poor innocent Rove a de facto way to go on with his life after all the swifting of his “integrity”and “patriotism”? All we have is the word of Luskin.
I think that Fitz is simply in the process of very carefully drafting his indictment.
